long overdue postscript - Frydenberg lies & Nats evasions

Alice Workman nails it

We know that the Morrison and Frydenberg Budgets and MYEFOs were full of bullshit, the Herald Sun revealed the same on road upgradings, but here's some icing:

12 May 2020 - I hope Alice will forgive my reproduction of her excellent work - https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/strewth/josh-frydenbergs-carpark-scheme-off-to-a-flying-stop/news-story/e2073a5f5378fee0b10508c844869a6a

Happy shouldabeen Budget Day! 

Here’s a fiscal riddle for you — how long does it take to build a carpark? Over a year if you’re the Morrison government. 

We all remember Josh Frydenberg’s Oprah moment from the April 2019 budget: you get a carpark! You get a carpark! If you’re in the right electorate you get a carpark! Frydenberg set aside $500m for a National (actually Western Australia, Victoria, NSW and Queensland) Commuter Carpark Fund, plus $149m from the Urban Congestion Fund, to pork-barrel thousands of spots adjacent to train stations. The only problem is, much like a parked car, it hasn’t gone anywhere. 

Only one carpark is under construction in Victoria. One singular sensation (cue A Chorus Line) out of the 47 projects (37 of which are in Liberal electorates, including four in the Treasurer’s seat of Kooyong) announced in the lead-up to Scott Morrison’s miracle win last May. 

The Department of Infrastructure, communicating with Strewth via a generic email address with no name or phone number attached, initially refused to give Strewth stats on the nada progress, instead providing us with a longwinded yada yada yada statement blaming the speed bump on COVID-19. But it’s clear the handbrake was applied before the pandemic hit.

A faceless mandarin from Alan Tudge’s department finally confessed: “The Hurstbridge Commuter Carpark in Victoria was the first to start construction in March 2020 and will be completed by the end of the year. A further five carparks are on track to start construction before the end of 2020 … To date, $17.4m has been paid to project proponents.” 

Despite she/he/they providing no dates or shovel-ready locations, Infrastructure insists “planning work has begun on every project” and “we are pushing to ensure that state governments and local councils carry out planning and delivery as quickly as possible”. 

That’s exactly what the buck-passing department told this column last November. Those on the ground tell us they’re ready to deliver projects but need the funds released. They liken the situation to an episode of the TV comedy Utopia, where bureaucratic red tape perpetually gets in the way. 

Especially as there are innovative companies out there — such as Perth-based Parkd — that erect relocatable carparks in days, not weeks, for less money than a traditional build. “There would be no better time to undertake the expansion and upgrade works to train station carparks than while we are experiencing lockdown measures,” Parking Australia chief executive Stuart Norman says. He points out that fast-tracking these projects is about “creating jobs, not just for the parking industry but in areas like construction, line-marking and for electrical contractors”. 

So, when will we finally see some action? Before the Queensland election in October? Or by March next year, when WA heads to the polls? Our guess? The 2022 federal election campaign.

The Morrison/Frydenberg Budget BBQ of Menzies & Howard

$100 billion, good or bad? What the Lobbies and PR don’t want us to know

Past elections saw genuine political battles such as over the Snowy, Warragamba, sewerage backlogs and Infrastructure Australia. There are two constants in the current blaumange: both sides want more metro trains; and neither, no one, wants us to delve into “$100 billion over 10 years”.

There are always choices, even if the choice is a blind eye, and with the increasingly sloppy, politicised way that “decisions” are made, there are always “unintended consequences”. The simplest question is, what does the balance sheet look like? What are the benefits and what are the costs? 

PM Turnbull with Morrison as Treasurer had their $75 billion over 10 years and no one in politics or the media challenged that properly.  PM Morrison and Frydenberg pumped that up to $100 billion and they are being challenged right here and now.

The Treasurer and his CEO were requested to provide a reconciliation of the line items under the $100 billion, against my assessment it was 2/3 short.  PM Morrison shifted out the Treasury CEO with a big promotion (for ...?) and no one replied. He did the same for Turnbull's appointee in the Infrastructure agency - both are now in position to cause maximum damage to NSW.  Media comment now is that Morrison has abandoned all mores and philosophies more than 3 years old, so no more cant about Menzies, Howard or Abbott.

 So here is the reconciliation they cannot contest because, like Berejiklian, they haven't done their sums:


The NSW Budget was a millstone.  Metros and connexes are debt-funded, producing a budget crisis within 5 years.  The Morrison program is not better:  there is no intention to reduce the Budget surplus or increase debt.  The Parramatta faux-tram has fallen over already due to lack of money - which is of course what happens when kids raid piggy banks.

Baird's privatisation windfalls went into “shiny toys”, meaning 85 per cent of the NSW infrastructure budget will serve less than 5 per cent of population growth, but satisfy Hong Kong investors. That is where the fact Vs promise problem started.

NSW has to debt-fund massive promises while ignoring cheaper, sooner and more effective options as embedded in the US’s ISTEA 1991 model, increasing debt by 774 per cent over the next four years. Official projections say the debt burden will equal 20 per cent of tax revenue, or the equivalent of the entire Education budget, by 2056.

Morrison is fully subscribed to that and has given big promotions to the few public officers who engineered the house of cards. We hope that future generations will be smarter but will face the massive costs of re-engineering. Current generations are in the dark.

As the Post’s masthead announces, “darkness is the enemy of democracy.” The great English reformer, Lord Acton, was known around the world in the late 19th Century, and one of his eternal aphorisms is: “Everything secret degenerates, even the administration of justice, nothing is safe that does not show how it can bear discussion and publicity.” 

While the Mueller controversy is raging in the US, a senior Australian minister is being accused of influencing a parliamentary committee’s report. Obstruction of political accountability and accurate reporting is “contemptible” in the words of an Australian legend, Bob Menzies, who was brother-in-arms to Winston Churchill, FDR and General Macarthur – in the Age of Giants:

To be one of those who mouth the catch‑cries of democracy and stridently clamour for their so called "right" from the cradle to the grave and after it, but at the same time dodge every civic responsibility, is to occupy a position not of dignity but of contempt.

Nancy Pelosi has been trying to rally a reform coalition, but her fate is the same as Australian reformers facing buccaneers. 

Democracies are subverted by dirty elections, renegade monopolists and quasi-monarchists, deskilled executive layers, and self-interested lobbyist/donors, none of whom can see the merits of campaign finance limitations or participative decision-making. Australia had a contentious experience in 2001 (the “Children overboard” election), and a key figure in that, Senator Arthur Sinodinos, is on his way as Australia’s new Ambassador to Washington.Executive profiles – A company is only as strong as its executive leadership. This is a good place to show off who’s occupying the corner offices. Write a nice bio about each executive that includes what they do, how long they’ve been at it, and what got them to where they are.

The $100 billion comprises a bucket of previously announced projects such as $10 billion on Inland Rail and $5.2 billion to Badgerys Airport, both being off-Budget. As Mark Ludlow of the AFR commented, this “could create a fiscal timebomb for future governments if the projects do not deliver commercial returns and the equity investment has to be moved back onto budget”. Inland Rail is a real worry as its economic case has been destroyed by the Western Sydney Metro (below). 

Large amounts go to congestion works which will cause construction-related congestion, if not longer-term through induced demand increases, and create resource cost increases by stretching construction capabilities across the country. The Government has not acknowledged or calculated these effects even though they were debated during PM Rudd’s GFC programs.

The promise of a fast train from Melbourne to Geelong is stated to be $2 billion, receives just $50 million over three years, and is said by the Victorian Government to be really $20 billion. $3.5 billion goes to a Western Sydney metro that will cost no less than $20 billion, and indeed an extra $20 billion and more if alternative rail freight lines have to be built as a consequence of putting metro trains across the plains.

The PM gave nothing to Berejiklian’s broken promises in his own electorate, primarily the deferral of the Gateways and F6 which would reduce truck impacts. Nor did he fund Berejiklian’s incredible 5 fast train routes but did put $40 million in for detailed assessments of five fast rail corridors from Sydney to Wollongong, Sydney to Parkes (via Bathurst and Orange), Melbourne to Albury Wodonga (duplicating CLARA?), Melbourne to Traralgon, and Brisbane to the Gold Coast. There would be no change from $100 billion and none will happen.  And that is only the Big Ticket items ....

The $100 billion thus becomes $200 billion.  That is a recipe for increasing community cynicism.

As an aside, Turnbull promised innovation. There are no signs anywhere of clever solutions to chronic problems in small areas like Bondi Beach, large areas like the Northern Beaches, and whole regions like South Eastern and Western Sydney, Wollongong and Newcastle. O'Farrell failed to deliver sensible planning and local government legislation (despite having the answer in the form of "Creative Reconstruction"), while Baird made both worse than before 2011. We should not forget the costs of digging muddy holes deeper.

The overall consequences include increased congestion in areas that are not receiving attention, including all fringe growth areas whose commuters congest interstate freeways. 

They include economic damage to the Inland Bridge’s communities and to the three port cities which have been cut off: Newcastle is said to need a $10 billion long rail bypass of Sydney which is an hallucination; Wollongong a new rail line from Port Kembla to near Campbelltown and across the plains, including a long tunnel under shale geology, say $25 billion; and Port Botany – it is digging in to increase trucking instead of railing.

The previous Turnbull/Morrison Budget put $400 million into a rail duplication at Port Botany which is expected to put not one extra train on the tracks. That is a waste of half a billion. Conversely, Morrison’s Backyard will have increased truck numbers, accidents and diesel fumes. WestConnex will be out of capacity by 2031, meaning the whole tollroad system in the South East is up in the air. There have been no known comprehensive health- and congestion-related valuation studies on such scenarios.

The $3.5 billion into Western Sydney is code for a desperate attempt to camouflage Berejiklian’s NW Metro disaster which was shown to have a benefit/cost ratio of about 0.5, by the only independent such study of metros (Jim Steer’s for the then Treasurer Michael Costa). The metro is being incrementally grown from a fulcrum at St Marys, both to the NW and SE to Campbelltown. There will be a destruction of freight capacity through the Sydney Basin.

Parramatta CBD is being hit by the St Marys mishap as well as the under-funded and ill-directed Greater Sydney Commission axial tram which replaced the ParraCity network strategy. It and the CBD/Eastern Suburbs and the Newcastle trams seem to have been designed to cause maximum damage and produce minimum benefits.

Both Coalition and Labor support St Marys and a West Metro which is probably infeasible as a tunnel, ill-placed considering residential densification potential, and too expensive, too long term, and too risky compared with the obvious options both refuse to consider. The economic costs in that corridor will be massive, taken with WestConnex’s drastic impacts at Rozelle – 20,000 more vehicles every day and all Berejiklian can do is spend $4 billion moving an intersection 1 kilometre to no effect, instead of $1 billion on a clever transit bridge.

Against all that, transit capacity in the Illawarra hits a crisis in 2020 and coal in 2030 – which are within the long lead times for major works. Sydney will be short some 14 million TEU container capacity versus the 5 million it will have, a shortfall of 70 per cent, in that timeframe, with none of the needed support from Newcastle, Brisbane and Melbourne. Newcastle, Kembla and general logistics reports are all pie-in-the-sky.

Treasurer Frydenberg pointedly refused to “repair” the City Deal/ports situation through MYEFO in December 2018. 

Former Treasurer Peter Costello’s Budget Honesty Act suggested the proposal to repair was appropriate; and the refusal included the involvement of Baird’s Treasury CEO who is now head of the Federal Treasury. In effect, the initial damage and the non-repair are linked.

Governmental economic and infrastructure incompetence at Federal and State levels is breathtaking. 

The Morrison $100 billion program, and NSW’s port and metro programs, are so illogical, so mis-directed, that their negative impacts will be many, many times larger. They will extend over Sydney and its regions in just the manner one would expect of a State Government which has no plan, no housing strategy, no matching of infrastructure with needs, no budget, just baloney.